The effects of “Conviction v. Admission” In Immigration Proceedings

When a crime is charged, and respondent is not convicted, it may cause him to be inadmissible when he admits the essential elements of the crime.

This inadmissibility happens under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i) (ground of inadmissibility for any alien who is convicted of or admits committing the essential acts of a crime involving moral turpitude).

However conviction of certain crimes causes a Green Card Holder, a Valid Visa Holder, or a Permanent Resident, to be removable from United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i) (ground of deportability for an alien convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude).

Use of Controlled Substance may also be grounds to be used to bar an applicant's entry like when applicant was determined inadmissible because he used marijuana in Philippines which was violation of a foreign state rules pertaining controlled substance. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II); Pazcoguin v. Radcliffe, 292 F.3d 1209, 1218 (9th Cir. 2002)

But What is a Conviction? A conviction happens when a court or a jury finds the alien guilty; whether a formal judgment has been entered or the alien has entered some form of plea (even nolo contendere or any form of admission to find guilt) or some form of penalty, punishment or restraint has been imposed upon alien. Reyes v. Lynch, 834 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir. 2016)

Nolo contendere means when a person charged in a criminal prosecution admits to be convicted by pleading guilty but does not admit guilt.

The laws here are very fact sensitive and at times appear unfair to an immigrant. For Example It has been decided that the underlying offense be labeled a crime as long as the proceedings are ‘criminal in nature. '” Diaz-Quirazco, 931 F.3d at 835, 843–46 ; violation of protection order is enough grounds to remove an alien.

Or, when a juvenile is tried as an adult under state laws, he can be removable under immigration laws; Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales, 497 F.3d 919, 927 (9th Cir. 2007). and Rangel-Zuazo v. Holder, 678 F.3d 967, 968–69 (9th Cir. 2012).

Immigration cases are complex and very different each time facts change. The best way to ensure your best interest is to consult with our immigration office today as we care about your individual case.

It is advisable to seek legal guidance from our office today as we strive to help guide you with your specific case. 

Attorney Ramona Kennedy cares about your case and will fight for you.

You can contact attorney Ramona Kennedy Law Offices (Kennedy Law LC) for an initial consultation and case evaluation. The first consultation is free of charge. 

WhatsApp, Phone +1(949)-677-0063

Email: [email protected]

Contact Us Today

Ramona Kennedy Law Offices (Kennedy Law L.C.) is committed to answering your questions about Personal Injury, Civil Litigation, Immigration (including Criminal ) Law in California.

We offer a Free Consultation and we'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu